This essay is my response to VDARE’s publication of a piece by Steve Sailer on Aug. 27, 2006.  VDARE declined to publish this response.

Steve Sailer’s essay, purportedly about an editorial project by the late Samuel Francis, was shallow and misleading. Sailer even saw fit to compare one of the writings to a book about penguins in a heavy-handed way to show witty contempt.

The Red Herring: Who Is White?

After briefly reviewing the Francis editorial project, Sailer abruptly raises the divisive question, “Who Is White?” which torments no one who has a decent sense of self-respect, and as a way to muddy up the overall issue.

And that question in this context on an immigration reform web site should provide the definitive anecdote illustrating the meaning of “red herring” in all dictionaries.  Addressing it as a weighty and oh-so-difficult matter, Sailer pretends to ponder whether Muslims, Iranians, Arabs, Chechens, Turks, Albanians, Greeks, Sicilians, and Jews are white.

Who Is White Answered

But the answer to “Who is white?” is simplicity itself.

White people are those young and old people who are attacked for being white on college campuses, on television news and entertainment programs, in the print media, and on sidewalks and playgrounds. White people have their whiteness defined for them by denunciation.

On the West Coast, media typically list major demographic groups with these labels: “African-American, Asian-American, and white.”  White people are those people given the label that has two negative characteristics: no capital letter and no American status. (Unless the label is “non-Hispanic white” which has three negative characteristics.)

White people are the ones never described as diverse or vibrant or culturally enriching.

White people are told that they have all the power, but who find that they do not have the power to choose their neighbors, their employees, and their children’s schools, or to end the campaign of defamation that flows over their children every day via the dominant media culture and the corporate entertainment culture.

Getting Down And Wrestling

Sailer’s next topic is his claim that “white Americans these days really don’t like getting down and wrestling with the Al Sharptons [sic] of the world for racial spoils.”  But he cites no evidence for this over-wrought claim and, in fact, Al Sharpton is probably the most wrestled with African-American ever. Consider the smackdown administered to him by an Italian-American attorney over the false claims of a kidnapping some years ago.  Sailer typically picked the worst example he could have so far as “getting down and wrestling” is concerned.

Our Friendly-Enemies

Unfortunately, Sailer’s ideological wanderings have yet to come home to a sensible place, and those of us who are conscious of the campaign of defamation against young European Americans need to speak out when needed against our friendly-enemies like Steve Sailer, Mark Steyn, Lawrence Auster, Henry Makow, Israel Shamir, and Eric Margolis.  Their advice, like their friendship, is tainted with strawmen, red herrings, slurs, hate caricatures, misleading historical bits, a supremacist claim to have the right to tell us what our name is and how we should think, unworthy vocabulary tricks, and/or the selection of their enemies for European Americans to hate and fear, too.

Immigration Reform

If friendly-enemies can help in the fight for responsible immigration, let’s welcome them to that fight.  However, the only line in Sailer’s essay that touched on immigration reform was, “Today, Karl Rove swearing allegiance in person to the immigration goals of the National Council of La Raza is considered somewhere between unobjectionable and admirable.”

That’s not enough to justify Sailer’s long-winded and mendacious attempt on an immigration reform web-site to describe and define whites, much less to prescribe how European Americans should think and feel about themselves.

Bo Sears
ResistingDefamation.org

One of the great questions of modern American politics is why FDR’s administration and the New Deal were never properly connected with the political theory of fascism in general and Mussolini in particular. While doing some research, I found this article from Chronicles Magazine which does a fairly good job of laying out the historical facts:

Until Abyssinia, Mussolini was hailed as a genius and a superman on both sides of the Atlantic, primarily because of his economic and social policies.  When FDR was inaugurated in March 1933, the world was praising Mussolini’s success in avoiding the Great Depression.  Roosevelt and his “Brain Trust,” the architects of the New Deal, were fascinated by Italy’s fascism—a term which was not perjorative at the time.  In America, it was seen as a form of economic nationalism built around consensus planning by the established elites in government, business, and labor.

READ MORE...

The New York Times reports that:

Three decades ago, in 1973, 78 percent of the students attending the nation’s public schools were white and 22 percent were minorities, a category including blacks, Hispanics, Asians and Pacific Islanders, and “other,” according to Education Department statistics. In 2004, the last year for which numbers were available, 57 percent of all public school students were white, while 43 percent were minorities.

If the GI generation had been told this rape of America was what they were fighting for in WW II, they would have joined Hitler.

Physorg reports that:

The Scythian warrior was found in June at a height of 2,600 meters (8,500 feet) in the Altay Mountains in an intact burial mound or kurgan… Researchers said the most striking feature about the man was his light blond hair, which Parzinger acknowledged may have yellowed after his death.

Charley Reese in Suncoast News via Tampa Bay Primer opines:

“Today, there is no avoiding stating the plain truth: We have a Jewish problem.”

A quick survey of blogs according to Google shows that 85% of the bloggers hate Pat Buchanan’s currently #1 Amazon book “State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America”.  A question immediately comes to mind:  Why the profound disconnect between the bloggers and the buyers?  One is to expect this sort of response out of the mainstream media but what is it about bloggers that makes them so in tune with the mainstream media and out of tune with the people on this issue?

The Wall Street Journal opines that:

Simply put, liberals have a big baby problem: They’re not having enough of them, they haven’t for a long time, and their pool of potential new voters is suffering as a result.

Uh, excuse me, but the GOP is the party of the land barons as much or more than the Democratic party and the GOP has been ravenously consuming the fertility of its own base by centralizing wealth to the point that it is now nearly four times as expensive to form a family, in real terms, as it was at the peak of the Baby Boom in the 1950s.  Moreover the neoconned GOP is just as responsible for filling the demographic vacuum with third world low-wage laborers a the Democratic party.

It is clear—both the Republican and Democratic parties are irredemably addicted to committing genocide against what the Founders of the United States called “our posterity”.  Time for the “Anti-Genocide Party”?

It looks like not even the Lansky mob bringing in hot Hollywood whores for Jim Robinson can tackle the problem facing freerepublic.com these days.  Buchanan’s book, at present #1 in the Amazon top 100 most popular books: “State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America” is sledge-hammering a wedge into the fault-line of the Republican Party around immigration.  What good are your hot Hollywood whores going to do you if you don’t even know what to tell your puppets to do?  Used to be Robinson would just ban anyone who questioned open borders or said anything positive about Buchanan’s stance against open borders.  Now if they try that there are web sites that just might take over FreeRepublic.com’s natural monopoly position and then what would the neocons do to control the thoughts of the online “conservatives”?  This is a microcosm of the GOP, make no mistake about it—and it is coming to a head in the next couple of months leading up to the election.